Nov 25, 2025
When selecting industrial valves, stainless steel valve bodies—thanks to their corrosion resistance and high strength—are widely used in chemical processing, water treatment, food production, and many other industries. However, although all three common materials belong to the stainless-steel family, 304, 316, and 316L differ greatly in performance. Choosing the wrong grade can lead to premature equipment failure, leaks, and serious safety risks. This article compares these materials in terms of composition, performance, and real-world application, helping you confidently choose the most suitable stainless-steel valve body.
Material performance starts with composition. All three are austenitic stainless steels containing chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni), but the key differences lie in the amounts of molybdenum (Mo) and carbon (C).
Elemental composition & Stainless steel grades | 304 Stainless Steel | 316 Stainless Steel | 316L Stainless Steel |
| Chromium | 18%-20% | 16%-18% | 16%-18% |
| Nickel | 8%-12% | 10%-14% | 10%-14% |
| Carbon | ≤0.08% | ≤0.08% | ≤0.03% |
| Molybdenum | 0% | 2%-3% | 2%-3% |

▪304 Stainless Steel
Stable in freshwater, steam, mild salts, and dry or slightly humid environments.
However, it performs poorly in:
Chloride environments (e.g., seawater)
Acidic or alkaline media
High-humidity industrial environments
It is prone to pitting and rust.
▪316 Stainless Steel
Thanks to added molybdenum, 316 withstands:
Low-concentration chlorides
Organic and inorganic acids
Weak coastal environments
But it still cannot handle high concentrations of chlorides or strong acids.
▪316L Stainless Steel
The top performer.
Excellent resistance to seawater, strong acids, high humidity, and high temperature
Prevents weld decay (intergranular corrosion)
It is the safest choice for extremely corrosive environments.
All three materials have:
Tensile strength ≥ 480 MPa
Yield strength ≥ 205 MPa
Well able to handle standard industrial pressures (≤2.5 MPa).
316L, with its low-carbon content, offers superior toughness and weldability, ideal for:
Complex valve structures
High/low-temperature conditions (-270℃ to 450℃)
| Material | cost | Reason |
| 304 | ☆ | No molybdenum; lower Ni content |
| 316 | ☆☆ | Added Mo; higher Ni |
| 316L | ☆☆☆ | Low-carbon manufacturing; stricter composition control |
Although 316L is the most expensive, its long-term durability reduces maintenance costs in harsh environments.

Suitable for:Building water supply and HVAC systems、Food-grade clean water delivery、Industrial cooling water / compressed air systems、Dry or slightly humid environments、System pressure ≤ 1.6 MPa
Notes: Don’t use 304 in chloride-rich or corrosive environments.
Suitable for:Weak acid/alkali chemicals (≤10% concentration)、Pharmaceutical pure water / distilled water、Industrial valves in coastal regions、Medium corrosion environments、System pressure ≤ 2.0 MPa
Advantages:Excellent balance between corrosion resistance and cost—often the default choice in higher-end industries.
Suitable for:Strong acid and alkali chemicals (H₂SO₄, HNO₃, HCl, etc.)、Seawater desalination systems、Marine ballast and offshore platform pipelines、High-temperature, high-humidity environments (e.g., Southeast Asia, Middle East)、 Welded or complex high-pressure valve structures (≤2.5 MPa)
Advantages:The safest choice for harsh environments.
Choosing valve materials should be based on actual working conditions, not “the more expensive, the better.”
If the medium is freshwater, steam, or clean air → 304
Economical, stable, and sufficient.
If the medium contains mild chlorides or weak chemicals → 316
Good balance of corrosion resistance and cost.
If the environment involves strong acids, seawater, or high humidity → 316L
Best performance and long-term reliability.
If pressure is >2.5 MPa → Prefer 316L
Better safety margin.
Selecting the right stainless-steel valve material means choosing a reliable partner for your system. 304 offers the best cost–performance ratio; 316 gives balanced corrosion resistance and durability; 316L provides maximum protection in harsh environments.
By matching material to your operating conditions, you can ensure system stability while achieving the best economic outcome.
If you also need to use any type of pneumatic valves in your system, you can contact us directly.
(FK9025)
Pneumatic Actuator: The Core Power Unit Behind Industrial Automation
Why Food Grade Diaphragm Valve Has Become the Standard in Hygienic Piping Systems
AV700 Series Fill Valve: A Comprehensive Application Guide
Pilot Pressure vs Working Pressure in Industrial Valves: Key Differences and Selection Guide
Water Hammer Explained: Why Angle Seat Valves Are the Optimal Solution
You May Interest In
Nov 21, 2025 Blog
How to determine valve seat angleFOKCA ©1998-2025 All Rights Reserved Sitemap